1. Introduction
Sonpatha (
Application of additives is adapted to the cultural needs[15] i.e. objectives of the experimental studies like micropropagation, regeneration, cytodifferentiation, androgenesis, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and biotransformation of cells as well as the particular plant species taken. In this chapter the importance of some additives like activated charcoal (AC), casein hydrolysate (CH), coconut milk (CM) & silver nitrate (AgNO3) & their impact on the direct & indirect
1.1. Activated charcoal (AC)
Activated charcoal (Carbonized wood) is a fine powdered wood charcoal added to tissue culture media, to bring about changes in the composition of the medium[16]. Being porous, it serves to adsorb toxic & phenolic tissue exudates in culture, which prevents inhibition of growth, promotes embryogenesis/ organogenesis Beneficial effects of addition of activated charcoal to media are highlighted by various researchers [17,18].
Activated charcoal (AC) has a very fine network of pores with large inner surface area on which many substances can be adsorbed & it is often used in tissue culture to improve cell growth and development. It plays critical roles in micropropagation, seed germination, somatic embryogenesis, anther culture, synthetic seed production, protoplast culture, rooting, stem elongation and bulb formation in different plants. The beneficial effects of AC on morphogenesis may be mainly due to its irreversible adsorption of inhibitory compounds in the culture medium and substantially decreasing the toxic metabolites, phenolic exudation and brown exudate accumulation [19]. In addition to this activated charcoal is involved in a number of stimulatory and inhibitory activities including the release of substances naturally present in AC which promote growth and darkening of culture media, adsorption of vitamins, metal ions and plant growth regulators, including abscisic acid and gaseous ethylene [20]. The effect of AC on growth regulator uptake is still unclear but some workers believe that AC may gradually release certain adsorbed products, such as nutrients and growth regulators which become available to plants. This review focuses on various roles of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture and the recent developments in this area.
1.2. Coconut milk (CM)
A natural complex may be used when a defined medium fails to support a particular growth response. Its addition makes a defined medium undefined since variations are to be expected in growth promoting or inhibitory compounds in these complexes [21]. A liquid endosperm such as coconut milk would be a good medium for embryo culture. It was first used successfully for culture of very young embryos of
1.3. Casein hydrolysate (CH)
Casein hydrolysate (CH) is an organic nitrogen supplement containing a mixture of amino acids. Being a good source of reduced nitrogen it has been widely used as an additive to embryo culture media [25,26]. It has proved superior to the combined effect of the amino acid mixture. It has been thought that nitrogen deficiency can cheaply be fulfilled by its addition [27,28] presumably it contains some stimulatory factors yet unidentified.
1.4. Silver nitrate (AgNO3)
Effect of nitrate supplementation in media has been well established in tissue culture [29,30] so as to enhance shoot multiplication and somatic embryogenesis. Several researchers assume that NO3 /NH4
+ ratio acts as buffering stabilization of medium pH resulting
Silver nitrate works as an inhibitor of ethylene activity [31] through the Ag2+ ions by reducing the receptor capacity to bind ethylene [32-35].With these observations, water solubility and lack of phytotoxicity at effective concentration led to its application in tissue culture [36].
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant materials and culture conditions
Seeds of
2.2. Callus induction, plant regeneration and rooting
Apical bud, axillary bud and embryonic axis explants were inoculated on MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of plant growth regulators to induce multiple shoots & callus. Calli were subcultured onto fresh medium every 20-22 days for further proliferation on suitable medium. Regenerated shoots were elongated up to approx 2 cm, excised and transferred to MS medium fortified with different (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 mgL-1) concentrations of NAA, IBA and IAA for root induction.
2.3. Fortification of additives into the media
Out of different plant growth regulators (auxins and cytokinins) used, the frequency of shoot initiation, rate of multiplication and shoot length was significantly high on BAP (1mgL-1) supplemented media (Selected medium SM) in both
2.4. Hardening and acclimatization
Approximately four-month-old plants bearing a well-developed root system were washed carefully to remove traces of agar. The plantlets (5 month old) remained fresh when transferred to conical flask with root system immersed in distilled water (4 days) followed by ordinary water (4 days). Such vigorously growing regenerated plantlets were then transferred to pots containing soil: sand (1:1) mixture for 15 days. Approx 82 % of the hardened plants survived in the pot.
2.5. Data recording:
To test the efficiency of direct shoot regeneration, frequency of shoot induction (FSI) directly from different explants was noted. While for indirect shoot regeneration, frequency of shoot regenerated from callus was calculated. Same parameters were calculated for rooting. The effect of continuous supplementation of plant growth regulators on indirect shoot regeneration was observed up to three subculture passages each of 20-22 days. Shoot buds obtained from I subculture passage were subsequently used as explants for II and III subculture passages. All experiments were completely randomized and repeated twice. Each treatment consisted of 25 replicates.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Activated charcoal
Activated charcoal has been reported to inhibit heavy leaching of phenolics [38]. In the present work AC successfully overcame this problem during regeneration resulting in shoots with good shoot length. However, the shoots formed in the presence of the AC were rather weak with small leaves (Plate 1, Figs. 1a-1c). Even at low concentration it (activated charcoal) inhibited multiple shoot formation (direct) (Graphs 1, 2) as well as callusing at the base of regenerated shoots. Inhibition of multiple shoot formation after AC supplementation was also observed in
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image1.jpeg)
Plate 1.
Effect of additives on multiple shoot regeneration from ApB and AxB explants of
3.2. Coconut milk
The explants remained totally unresponsive when cultured on MS medium fortified with CM. Significant reduction in frequency of shoot initiation, shoot number (SN) and shoot length (SL) was found. Mostly shoots developed with only one leaf at a node. Leaves were small in size and light green in colour (Plate 2, Figs. 6a-7b). Increment in basal callusing was observed after 6-8 days of inoculation. Callus was fresh, light brown in colour and non-regenerative in nature. Coconut milk supplementation as an additive in combination with BAP did not support multiplication of shoot either directly or indirectly in
3.3. Casein hydrolysate (CH)
Casein hydrolysate (CH) supplementation to culture medium successfully overcame inhibition of regeneration from explants directly as well as indirectly. The number of shoots was found to be enhanced on CH (20 mgL-1) supplemented medium resulting in 9.34 fold increase over control. Higher concs. of CH (30 and 40 mgL-1) resulted in no further increase in the number of shoots (Graphs 1-3). CH has also been found useful in
Compared to shoot number (SN) shoot length (SL) was adversely affected at all concs. of CH enhancing only 0.5 to 2 cm shoot length in apical meristem derived shoots and 0.7 –1.0 cm in axillary bud derived shoots respectively (Plate 2, Figs. 1a-5). CH (500 mg L−1) supplemented medium did not support shoot growth as a consequence of which shoots remained compact and stunted. In some cases reduced concentrations of CH induced elongation of shoots [44]. CH was unable to induce indirect multiple shoot formation from calli as efficiently as directly from the explants (Graph 4).
3.4. Silver nitrate (AgNO3)
Maximum frequency of shoot intiation has been observed on AgNO3 supplemented medium in both types of shoot regeneration systems (direct and indirect) among all the additives attempted (Graph1). Explants when treated with different concs. of AgNO3 (0.1, 1, 2, 4 mgL−1) with BAP (1mgL−1) resulted in the formation of healthy shoots bearing large dark green leaves (Plate 1, Figs. 2a-5). Silver nitrate has produced positive effect on all the shoot
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image2.jpeg)
Plate 2.
Effect of additives on multiple shoot regeneration from ApB and AxB explants of
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image3.jpeg)
Plate 3.
Effect of additives on multiple shoot regeneration (indirect) and rooting from in
regeneration parameters FSI (Frequency of Shoot Initiation), MNS (Mean Number of Shoots), MSL (Mean Shoot Length) for direct and indirect regeneration, Graph 1-4) and rooting parameters FR (Frequency of Rooting), MNR (Mean Number of Roots), MRL (Mean Root Length) (Graph 5) tested for regeneration of
Addition of AgNO3 in culture media resulted in maximum rooting frequency and root length (Graph 5) of
4. Conclusion
The
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image4.png)
Figure 1.
Effect of BAP +Additives on FSI from different explants of O. indicum (L.) Vent.
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image5.png)
Figure 2.
Effects of BAP +Additives on MSN from different explants of O.indicum Vent.
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image6.png)
Figure 3.
Effect of BAP +Additives on MSL from different explants of O. indicum (L.) Vent.
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/40185/1512345123/media/image7.png)
Figure 4.
Effect of BAP +Additives on MSN (indirect) in O.indicum (L.) Vent
References
- 1.
Darshan S. Ved D. K. 2003 A Balanced Perspective for Management of Indian Medicinal Plants. Ind. forest.275 288 - 2.
Ved D. K. Kinhal G. A. Ravikumar K. Mohan K. Vijayshankar R. Indresha J. H. 2003 Threat Assessment and Management Prioritization FRLHT Bangalore87 88 - 3.
Chen L. Games D. E. Jones J. 2003 Isolation and Identification of Four Flavonoid Constituents from the Seeds of Oroxylum indicum by High Speed Counter Current Chromatography. J. chrom.988 1 95 105 - 4.
Yasodha R. Ghosh M. Santan B. Gurumurthi K. 2004 Importance of Biotechnological Research in Tree Species of Dashmula. Ind. forest.130 79 88 - 5.
Lambertini E. Piva R. Khan M. T. H. Bianchi N. Borgatti M. Gambari R. 2004 Effects of Extracts from Bangladeshi Medicinal Plant In Vitro Proliferation of Human Breast Cancer Cell and Expression of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Gene. Int. j. oncology24 419 423 - 6.
Anonymous 1966 Wealth of India. Vol. II, Publication and Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi, India 107-108, - 7.
Dey A C 1980 Indian Medicinal Plants Used in Ayurvedic Preparations. Bishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun202 - 8.
Bennet S S R, Gupta P C, Rao R V 1992 Venerated Plants. ICFRE, Dehradun147 149 - 9.
Jain S. P. Singh J. Singh S. C. 2003 Rare and Endangered Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Madhya Pradesh. J. econ. taxon. bot. 27:4:925-932. - 10.
Jayaram K, Prasad M N V 2008 Genetic Diversity in Oroxylum indicum (L) Vent. (Bignoniaceae) A Vulnerable Medicinal Plant by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Marker Afr. j. biotechnol.7 3 254 262 - 11.
Gokhale M. Bansal Y. K. 2006 An avowel of Importance of an Endangered Tree Shivnak (Oroxylum indicum (L) Vent). Nat. prod. rad.5 2 112 114 - 12.
Gokhale M. Bansal Y. K. 2009 Direct In Vitro Regeneration of a Medicinal Tree Oroxylum indicum (L.) Vent. Through Tissue Culture. Afr. j.biotechnol.8 16 3777 3781 - 13.
Gokhale M. Bansal Y. K. 2010 Indirect organogenesis in Oroxylum indicum (L.) vent. Ind. Forest.136 6 804 811 - 14.
Fossard R. A. de Giladi I. Altman A. Goren R. 1977 Tissue Culture in Horticulture- A Perspective. Acta hortic.78 455 459 - 15.
Vinod K. Parvatam G. Gokare A. R. 2009 AgNO3- A Potential Regulator of Ethylene Activity and Plant Growth Modulator. Electronic j. biotech.12 2 1 15 - 16.
Van Winkle S. C. Pullman G. S. 1995 The Role of Activated Carbon in Tissue Culture Medium Energeia CAER University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research.6 6 2 4 - 17.
Groll J. Gray V. M. Mycock D. J. 2002 Development of Cassava (Manihot esculanta Crantz.) Somatic Embryos During Culture with Abscisic Acid and Activated Charcoal J. plant physiol.159 4 437 443 - 18.
Thomas D. 2008 The Role of Activated Charcoal In Plant Tissue Culture. Biotechnol. advan.26 6 618 631 - 19.
Pan M. J. van Stedan J. 1998 The Use of Charcoal In In Vitro Culture- A Review. Plant growth regu.26 3 155 163 - 20.
Peck D E, Cummings B G 1986 Beneficial Effects of Activated Charcoal on Bulblet Production In Tissue Cultures of Muscari armeniacum. Plant cell tiss. org. cult.6 9 14 - 21.
Mishra S.P. 2009 editor) Culture Media, Growth Regulators and Nutrient Supplements In: Plant Tissue Culture. Ane Books Pvt. Ltd41 50 - 22.
van Overbeek J. Conklin M. E. Blakeslee A. F. 1941 Factors in Coconut Milk Essential For Growth and Development of Very Young Datura Embryos. Science94 350 351 - 23.
Gautheret R J 1985 History Of Plant Tissue & Cell Culture: A Personal Account. In: Vasil I.K. editor, Cell Culture & Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants Vol. II Cell Growth, Nutrition, Cytodifferentiation & Cryopreservation. Academic Press, Inc.2 50 - 24.
Yong J W H, Ge L, Ng Y F, Tan S N 2009 Chemical Composition and Biological Properties of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Water. Molecules14 5144 5164 - 25.
Cameron-Mills V. Duffus C. M. 1977 The In Vitro Culture of Immature Barley Embryos on Different Culture Media. Ann. bot.41 1117 1127 - 26.
Narayanswamy S. 2007 Tissue Nutrition-Growth Hormones. Plant Cell and Tissue Culture. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd, New Delhi22 50 - 27.
George E F 1993 Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Part 1: The Technology. Exegetics Ltd., Edington, Wiltshire, England - 28.
Al-Khayri J M 2011 Influence of Yeast Extract and Casein Hydrolysate on Callus Multiplication and Somatic Embryogenesis of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Scientia horticult.130 3 531 535 - 29.
Idei S. Kondo K. 1998 Effects of3 and BAP on Organogenesis in Tissue Cultured Shoot Primordia Induced from Shoot Apics of Utricularia praelonga St. Plant cell rep.17 451 456 - 30.
Ramage C M, Williams R R 2002 Mineral Nutrition and Plant Morphogenesis. In vitro cell dev. biol.- plant38 116 124 - 31.
Chi G L, Pua E C, Goh C J 1991 Role of Ethylene on de Novo Shoot Regeneration from Cotyledonary Explants of Brassica campestris sp. pekinensis (Lour) Olsson In Vitro. Plant physiol.96 178 183 - 32.
Beyer E M 1976c Silver ion: A Potent Anti-Ethylene Agent in Cucumber and Tomato. Hort. scien.11 3 175 196 - 33.
Yang S F 1985 Biosynthesis and Action of Ethylene Hort. scien.20 1 41 45 - 34.
Bais H. P. George J. Ravishankar G. A. 1999 Influence of Polyamines On Growth Of Hairy Root Cultures of Witloof Chiocory (Chicorium intybus L cv Lucknow local) and Formation of Coumarins. J. plant growth regu.18 1 33 37 - 35.
Bais H. P. Sudha G. Ravishankar G. A. 2000b Putrescine and Silver Nitrate Influence Shoot Multiplication In Vitro Flowering and Endogenous Titers of Polyamines in Cichorium intybus L cv. Lucknow local. J. plant growth regu.19 238 248 - 36.
Beyer E M 1976a A Potent Inhibitor of Ethylene Agent in Plants. Plant physiol.58 3 268 271 - 37.
Murashige T. Skoog F. 1962 A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. plant15 473 497 - 38.
Dumas E. Monteuuis O. 1995 In vitro Rooting of Micropropagated Shoots from Juvenile and Mature Pinus pinaster Explants : Influence of Activated Charcoal. Plant cell tiss. org. cult.40 231 235 - 39.
Fraguas C. B. Pasqual M. Dutra L. F. Cazetta J. O. 2004 Micropropagation of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Roxo de Valinhos Plants. In vitro cell dev. biol.- plant40 471 474 - 40.
Halperin W. Wetherell D. F. 1964 Adventive Embryony in Tissue Culture of Wild Carrot, Daucus carota. Amer. j. bot.51 274 283 - 41.
Ammirato P V 1983 Embryogenesis. In: Evans D A, Sharp W R, Ammirato P V, Yamada Y, editors. Handbook of Plant Cell Culture. Vol. I Macmillan, New York,82 123 - 42.
Saxena S. Dhawan V. 2001 Large-scale Production of Anogeissus pendula and Anogeissus latifolia by micropropagation. In vitro cell dev. biol.- plant37 586 591 - 43.
Walia N. Kour A. Babbar S. B. 2007 An Efficient, In Vitro Cyclic Production of Shoots from Adult Trees of Crataeva nurvala Buch.Ham. Plant cell rep.26 277 284 - 44.
Chaturvedi R. Razdan M. K. Bhojwani S. S. 2004 In Vitro Clonal Propagation of an Adult Tree of Neem (Azadirachata indica A. Juss.) by Forced Axillary Branching. Plant sci.166 2 501 506 - 45.
Chongjin J. G. Siewkeng N. Prakash L. Chiangshong Goh. C. J. Ng S. K. Loh C. S. 1997 The Role of Ethylene on Direct Shoot Bud Regeneration From Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) Leaves Cultured In Vitro. Plant sci.124 193 202 - 46.
Kumar S. Sarkar A. K. Kuhikannan C. 1998 Regeneration of plants from Leaflet Explants of Tissue Culture Raised Safed Siris (Albizia procera) Plant cell tiss. org. cult.54 137 143 - 47.
Zhang P. Phansiri S. Puanti-Kaerlas J. 2001 Improvement of Cassava Shoot Organogenesis by the Use of Silver Nitrate In Vitro. Plant cell tiss org cult.67 47 54 - 48.
Giridhar P. Reddy O. B. Ravishankar G. A. 2001 Silver Nitrate Influences In Vitro Shoot Multiplication and Root Formation in Vanilla planifolia Andr. Curr. sci.81 9 1166 1170 - 49.
Ganesh S D, Sreenath H L 1996 Silver Nitrate Enhanced Shoot Development in Cultured Apical Shoot Buds of Coffea arabica Cv Cauvery (S4347). J. plant. crops24 577 580 - 50.
Fuentes S. R. L. Calheiros M. B. P. Manettiflho J. Vieira l. G. E. 2000 The Effects of Silver Nitrate And Different Carbohydrate Sources on Somatic Embryogenesis in Coffea canephora. Plant cell tiss. org. cult.60 1 5 13 - 51.
Chi G L, Barfield D G, Sim G E, Pua E C 1990 Effect of AgNO3 and Amino-ethoxyvinylglycine on In Vitro Shoot Organogenesis From Seedling Explants of Recalcitrant Brassica genotypes. Plant cell rep.9 4 195 198 - 52.
Palmer C E 1992 Enhanced Shoot Regeneration from Brassica campestris by Silver Nitrate. Plant cell rep.11 11 541 545 - 53.
Vasil I K 1987 Developing Cell and Tissue Culture System for the Improvement of Cereal and Grass Crops J. plant physiol. 128(3):193-218, - 54.
Bais H. P. Sudha G. Suresh B. Ravishankar G. A. 2000a AgNO3 influences In Vitro Root Formation in Decalepis hamiltonii Curr. sci.79 894 898 - 55.
Reddy B. O. Giridhar P. Ravishankar G. A. 2001 In Vitro Rooting of Dacalepis hamiltonii Wight and Arn an Endangered Shrub by Auxins and Root Promoting Agents Curr. sci81 11 1479 81 - 56.
Sunandakumari C. Martin K. P. Chithra M. Madhusoodan P. V. 2004 Silver nitrate Induced Rooting and Flowering In Vitro on Rare Rhoeophytic Woody Medicinal Plant Rotula aquatica Lour. Ind. j. biotech.3 3 418 421